Ufological Pushback Against the Scientific Method and its Proponents? A Hypocritical Course of Action.

-

Greetings. Why is a data-driven, skeptical, dispassionate approach to the UFO problem viewed in such a negative light by some in the UFO subculture? 

Why does the application of the scientific method garner such consistent pushback from some in the UFO subculture?

While there have been some historical examples of credentialed scientists taking a look at the UFO problem, such occurrences are relatively rare, and certainly not the norm. The UFO phenomenon and its attached subculture, have always been viewed in a negative light by the greater scientific research community. The fault for some of that reasoning lies squarely at the feet of the UFO subculture itself, with its tinfoil hat, costume wearing adherents, and its penchant for embracing the "woo" and other beliefs and mythologies that are "grounded" in faith and not supported by any irrefutable evidence whatsoever. 

Has the situation changed to any substantial degree over the decades? I believe it has, but only by a miniscule amount. A few of today's scientists have begun to take a look at the UFO issue, with widely varying degrees of dedication. Unfortunately, some of those very same scientists have willingly abandoned their strict adherence to the scientific method and its tried and true methodologies in the process, for reasons unknown. In my humble opinion, the powerful lure of the ufological spotlight, with its accompanying fame and notoriety, is a primary reason for the abandonment. 

Throwing additional snags to the muddle are the actions of some in UFO circles. Pushback against efforts to examine and investigate the UFO problem via scientific means has become something only too commonplace, with those who practice the modus operandi erroneously labeled as debunkers, or worse yet, victimized by a wave of character assassinations that target personal lives and details, not any investigative results originating from scientific research into the topic in question. Remember Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick? He continues to be vilified by people in the UFO subculture who have never met the man in person. Talk about childish and abhorrent behavior. 

Why is this occurring? Are some alleged UFO witnesses close-minded, and unwilling to accept the findings that are the direct result of dispassionate scientific examinations of their alleged experiences? That certainly is one reason. Some alleged UFO witnesses want confirmation, not answers supported by physical evidence. Is the greater UFO subculture uncomfortable with the idea that far more qualified individuals are coolly scrutinizing the entire UFO scenario, digging for tangible evidence, and discovering that there is nothing to be uncovered, nothing anomalous at least? Perhaps. Is the UFO entertainment industry wanting to protect its position in the UFO social club, its indefensible talking points, its sensationalized narrative, and its religious UFO mythologies? Since there are monies involved, absolutely. Scientific methodologies may find explanations that the UFO subculture will be completely uncomfortable with, explanations that contradict their own decades-long, dogmatically held beliefs about aliens, abductions, crash retrievals, and government cover-ups. 

The reactions of the UFO subculture to the scientific method, its practitioners, and its methodologies truly speak volumes and reverberate throughout the echo chamber that is the UFO arena. That will likely never change. However, when credentialed and highly educated scientists get involved in the UFO subculture, and when those same scientists speak in glowing terms about the possibilities of alien visitation despite the lack of irrefutable evidence, they are embraced wholeheartedly, with open minds and open legs. A few of the names are familiar, or infamous; Garry Nolan, Michio Kaku, Bob McGwier, and the Harvard theoretical physicist turned fraud/crackpot otherwise known as Avi Loeb. Seems that scientists are vilified, unless they hold, or profess to hold positions about the UFO phenomenon that are in agreement with the majority of the true believing UFO masses. Talk about hypocritical.


 Thank you for your time and consideration.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Burning Ufological Bridges: The Effort to Protect One's Standing in the UFO Social Club.

-
Image
Greetings. Burning bridges, a course of action that rarely, if ever, occurs in the chaotic and muddled excrement exchange program known as the UFO subculture.  The UFO world is a pseudoscientific playground, devoid of scientific methodologies and critical thought processes. Tangible evidence is of no importance, with unconfirmed storytelling holding court with the tinfoil hat wearing UFO masses. It may have always been this way, even during the heady days of Coral and Jim Lorenzen, but the current situation seems to be an undefeatable opponent, at least for those individuals who hold that scientific research efforts are the sole productive road to travel down.  By direct contrast, the scientific research community conducts itself in a completely different manner, with public scrutiny, open transparency, and peer-reviewed exercises held in high regard. The UFO research community doesn't have any professional methodological standards, nor does it conduct any sort of open back-an...
Read more

The De-Evolution of the UFO Subculture: A Ufological Wallace Line.

-
Image
Greetings. Ever since Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace conceived of the theory of natural selection, the theory of evolution, the term has been applied to a multitude of topics, most of which referring to the gradual advancement of the technology our species has at its disposal.  Whether it be the internal combustion engines contained within the vast majority of automobiles currently in use on the planet, the computer systems that seem to have taken over the day-to-day mundane tasks and responsibilities of the human species, or the copious amounts of weaponry stored and kept at the ready by many of the nations of the world, our technology has slowly been advancing in complexity, increasing in overall capability. Have humans changed to keep pace? Not really. We are still the rascist, warlike, belligerent, heavily armed species of hominid we have always been since we initially descended from the trees of sub-Saharan Africa several hundred thousand years ago.  But I digre...
Read more